Original 150 Rosary Research Files from rosariofatima.wordpress.com
For those interested in the Original Rosary 150 but require more evidence, the following research has been compiled by the editor of the Sedevacantist website rosariofatima.wordpress.com. It proves our original 150 form and chronicles the gradual changes that eventually led to the Novus Ordo's heretical and ineffective pentagram rosary commonly used today. You can visit the website by following the link below.
Now I'm sending you the 85 slides with their notes:
From now on, you will see the pages available for reading on the googlebooks site. Let’s check the first book:
Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons
Let me introduce to you Henry of Kalkar.
At that time Our Lady’s Psalter and the Rosary were not the same thing.
By the way, let me introduce to you Dominic of Prussia.
The 50 clausulae are related with the biblical Jesus. More of this later.
Thanks to Alan’s preaching, Our Lady’s Psalterium became more popular, on this book they were generous with him. In other works, he is considered a crazy guy.
James Sprenger had permission from the Holy See.
Slide 7 to Slide 12
On these 6 slides the 50 jesus clausulae will be shown in English, Italian, Spanish, German, French and Portuguese.
Let’s check the second book: Beads and Prayers: The Rosary in History and Devotion. The front cover was not available.
Dominic of Prussia is on the stage again. According to this book, this prussian guy and his colleague Adolf of Essen were influenced by the Devotio Moderna, a pro-biblical mystic movement.
“Devotio Moderna arose at the same time as Christian Humanism, a meshing of Renaissance Humanism and Christianity, and is related to German mysticism and other movements which promoted an intense personal relationship with God. Practitioners of the Devotio Moderna emphasized the inner life of the individual and promoted meditation according to certain strictures (sic). With the ideals of Christian Humanism, Devotio Moderna recommended a more individual attitude towards belief and religion. It is regarded sometimes as a contributing factor for Lutheranism and Calvinism. It was also a major influence upon Erasmus, who was brought up in this tradition.”
An explanation of what the Modern Devotion really was. This article is written in Spanish, but here it is the original translation into English:
However, you will read below the same translation with my commentaries included (in parenthesis). I made some changes to make it more legible in English.
“Responding to the need for reform, a movement extends throughout Europe, starting from the Netherlands, then called “Devotio Moderna“ (Modern Devotion), which is the vehicle for renewal of life of the laity and of the religious and monastic orders, and opening of new forms of apostolate. Its base is contemplation and union with God through knowledge of Scripture (the bible), prayer and divine illumination (can you smell what they were into?), no matter the clerical or secular state. Some of his statements regarding the Enlightment (or Illumination) caused the mistrust of hierarchy and the opposition of the theologians.”
“They formed groups of laity and clergy leading common life and called themselves "Friends of God“ in Rhineland. Followers of earlier Christian traditions (as you say the first protestant guys, the pro-jewish ones), insist above all on the evangelical virtues and the mystical experience, underestimating, sometimes excessively, sacramental practice, getting to the point of denying any value to them, generating distrust of the hierarchy, in any case.” (This sounds so charismatical and so neo-cathecumenal)
“The diversity of lay movements, many of them imbued with heterodoxy, and the difficult to make distinction between them, supported those suspicions. It is certainly very difficult to distinguish the different groups: "Friends of God", brothers of the Free Spirit (Satan maybe?), affirming the need to end the Church (this is not new: the infiltration of the Church to destroy it from inside) and that their ideas mixed in a background of pantheism with Gnosticism and Manichaeism, "Beghards" and "Beguine" , many of them were orthodox, but always outside the discipline hierarchical tertiary communities, Waldensian , "fratricelli" , or simple rebel clerics living outside any discipline.”
“The distant origins of “Modern Devotion" is the work of the German Dominican John Eckhart, the darkness of his work, which often walks over the very border of orthodoxy, especially his claim the soul's union with God, through a spiritual itinerary (what kind of trip is he talking about?) , sounded so pantheistic and arouse many suspicions. Finally, some of his propositions were condemned and some other confusing declared, despite which their work spread unhindered and exerted an extraordinary influence, through his direct disciples, and others inspired by him, in the “Modern Devotion".”
The guy spoke for himself.
Now we see Our Lady and the Virgin Mary are not the same.
Now you see the monks working together promoting that practice.
Properly speaking, they changed the devotion requested by Our Lady and transformed it into a Jewish Mary/Jewish Jesus prayer. But they were not the first ones suggesting this.
That’s what happens when monks and nuns are allowed to read the bible inside their monasteries.
Ah, what can I say? Bible-mania has been a disaster for Catholicism.
You already have this one posted on the webpage. The whole idea about the mysteries is a human creation, not divine revelation.
I added this picture to show everyone else that the baby Horus-Jesus is not a Catholic devotion.
There’s a difference between Our Lady’s Psalter and the Carthusian Rosary. The changes were imposed.
Now we realize how the mysteries came up.
Jakob Sprenger and Michael Francisci working together.
Actually the Rosary 150 protects us from attacks of the dark side guys, including the jews. I have experienced that.
The bull mentioned was written on 1479, unless they’re talking about another one.
What does Martin Luther have to do with this? Maybe the indulgences debate was a cover for the Reformation.
After the changes (inserting the our father prayer and linking the Rosary with the bible and its hero, the heretical Lord Jesus/Jewish Messiah), these guys were ready to propagate the practice among the people.
The five joyful mysteries. Nothing more to be said.
The five glorious mysteries. Nothing more to be said.
The whole set.
They admit the picture Rosary was not about Our Lady, but it was focused on the bible entirely.
The term “Reform” always sound suspicious when is related to Catholicism.
From now on the “reformers” have a licence to preach. By the way, three popes has written something about the Rosary before Pius V: Sixtus IV (Bull Ea quae ex fidelium May the 12th 1479), Leo X (Bull Pastoris aeterni October the 9th 1520) and Clement VII (Bull Etsi temporalium cura nos May the 8th 1534). I have those.
Finally Pius V shows up. During his 6 years and 115 days of work as a pope he wrote 151 bulls according to the Magnum Bullarium Romanum Volume 2 which I sent you on the dvd. (almost 24 bulls per year)
It’s interesting because only Urban VIII surpasses him: he wrote 169 bulls, but he needed 20 years and 358 days in office to do so (about 8 bulls per year).
So the “Glory be” and the Apostle’s Creed were not part of the original Rosary.
The Dominican Rosary has 164 beads (150 Hail Marys and 14 Paternosters, the 15th one is in the pendent).
Why does the “Holy See” allow to pray the Carthusian Rosary and not the Original Rosary? Maybe they thought it was impossible to recover, or nobody would care about it.
Slide 39 to 43
I took a picture of this page and included it on this powerpoint file in order to show there are books dealing with this issue. When you speak about the changes of the Rosary to the average “catholic” they deride you as nuts. Anyway, the whole list in 6 different languages are included on this file.
Slide 44 and 45
Some modern examples of the Jesus Clausulae, all about the Biblical Jesus.
Let’s check the third book: Stories of the Rose:
The Making of the Rosary in the Middle Ages
The Rosary 150 is so powerful that its enemies have tried to erase the evidence of its existence.
So, from that time there were four devotions: Our Lady’s Psalterium (150 Hail Marys), The Lord’s Psalterium (150 Paternosters), The 150 Affirmations of Faith in Jesus and the 150 Affirmations of Faith in Mary (the last two linked with the Psalms and other books of the Old Testament).
These two devotion were for the literate people only, because it was a study of the Bible.
Dominic of Prussia is on the stage again.
This is interesting: On the later years of 15th century there was a difference between “Psalter” (150 Hail Marys) and “Rosary” (50 Hail Marys), and you could choose the type you like to pray. The original one that we know as Rosary 150 was fading out among so many variations. But in 1569 Pius V made official his favorite one.
Now we see again Alanus against the world.
The manuscript Digby 86 does exist, I downloaded some scanned sheets, but as usual, there’s no scanned copy of the part which dividing the 150 aves into three sections of fifty is recomended.
But this means something: even from 1275 modifications to the Rosary have been made.
So Francisci edited Alanus’ work. It seems Sprenger has something to do with it.
What was the obsession of marking off the tens with fifteen Paternosters? Maybe it was a method to subtlely insult God’ own sacrifice.
Again, a Psalter has three rosaries. “And the same time meditate on the rose-red blood of Christ Jesus, that God, Our Father, wished to be shed on our behalf”. I think my question about the paternoster obsession is answered: The Arian issue.
Obviously Saint Dominic of Guzman and Dominic of Prussia are not the same. But something comes to my mind: Alanus had visions of Our Lady, Dominic of Prussia had visions of Mary.
Even though the meditations were first mentioned on Alanus’ Liber apologeticus, I have a hunch those meditations were included without Alanus’ approval.
These guys, Francisci and Sprenger were working together after Alanus’ death. Probably they took advantage of his previous preaching.
Let’s check the fourth book: A pilgrim’s History of the Rosary.
We see again the two “psalters” or “psalteria”, pick your favorite plural.
Maybe this acceptance toward Our Lady was a counter attack against those guys in robes who were preaching and studying the Bible. But even back then you see the trojan horses: Albert the Great, Thomas Aquinas.
There’s a hidden heresy over here: Arianism
Let me introduce to you the Psalter of 150 Affirmations of Faith in Christ, its purpose and some examples. Bible-mania everywhere.
This “enlightening” study is about the jesus of the bible.
These theologians were part of the dark side. Now let me introduce to you the 150 praises of the Blessed Virgin. So they mixed the practice of the 150 Psalms for their comming messiah with Mary of the Bible. That’s what happens with idle monks.
Slide 66 and 67
According to this author, this is the way the final Rosary was created. Bible-mania everywhere.
The mystery of the mysteries is not a mystery after all. Now Henry of Kalkar and Dominic of Prussia are back on the stage as the next slides will show.
Henry of Kalkar: the guy of the Paternosters. It seems Dominic of Prussia had too much spare time.
The transformation from Our Lady’s Psalter to the Pentagram Rosary explained in one single paragraph. As a bonus: the origin of the Rosary pendent.
Dominic of Prussia’s work couldn’t be handled by the majority, so they got a shorter version of that practice, with pictures.
Let’s check the fifth book:
Mere Catholicism: What the Catholic Church Teaches and Practices
I also find this kid very disturbing. Is he Jesus/Horus or Cupid?
Please notice this: They’re talking about the Jewish Mary, not Our Lady. This proves your research about the Talmud was right. The Novus Ordo priests imitate Jewish priests practices.
These elementary explanations are made for non-catholic readers for ecumenical purposes.
Three truths and one lie on these paragraphs. How could Saint Dominic of Guzman be considered the author of the meditations about the life of Jesus? Maybe someone long ago deliberately assumed Dominic of Guzman and Dominic of Kalkar to be the same.
The luminous mysteries are not a new idea after all. 3 out of 5 come from the Jesus Clausulae by Dominic of Prussia.
15. … Jesus, whom John had baptized in the Jordan and shown out to be the Lamb of God. The wedding feast is missing, but here is the hidden message: What is able to transform water and soil (that is what the containers represent) into food (wine in this case, but we know wine comes from grapes and grapes come from the soil)?: Here is the answer: The Sun.
17. … Jesus, who, after having chosen the disciples, preached the kingdom of God.
The transfiguration is missing, but you already explained that on your webpage: the Sun-God and his prophets.
22. … Jesus, who in the Last Supper instituted the sacrament of his Body and Blood.
Let’s check the sixth and last book:
The Mystery of the Rosary. Marian Devotion and the Reinvention of Catholicism
We’re almost done. I added this book just for a few things that were not considered on the previous ones.
Non-Catholic leaders never care about their congregations. They just want to get higher up Jacob's ladder in the Kingdom of Hell.
These Cistercian nuns spent too much time reading the Scriptures. Bible-mania everywhere.
These guys are product of the Modern Devotion, we wrote about it on the 14th slide of this .ppt file. It took many years for them to modify Our Lady’s Psalter. The enemies of the Catholic Church have been working really hard for their Lord. It will take many years to wake people up, I hope this research may help a little bit.
This description highlighted in blue was extracted from a book printed in 1699 which you can preview on this link:
Page 81 of the second volume (309 of the entire book) I already downloaded it, and will send it to you entirely in the near future with some other books I am gathering.
Michael Francis and James Springer (page 101 from the third volume, page 497 of the entire book)
Gerard Groote, the first guy of the Modern Devotion (302 of the entire book, page 74 from the second volume)
Eckard (307 of the entire book, 79 of the second volume)
Alanus de la Roche (Page 502 of the entire book)